Investing In Times Of Uncertainty

Investing In Times Of Uncertainty

It’s easy to stick to your long-term investing plan when times are good. Indeed, if your investment portfolio had any U.S. market exposure at all over the past 12 years you’ve likely enjoyed nearly uninterrupted growth.

Of course, there are always bumps in the road. Stocks fell sharply in a short period between February and March 2020, the swiftest decline in history. The world was shutting down in response to the COVID-19 pandemic and investors panicked. But stocks came roaring back and the S&P 500 ended the year with a gain of 18.4%. Things were good again. Until they weren’t.

Investors have been worried about a prolonged stock market crash for years. Those fears are heightened each year that stocks continue to rise. Surely this can’t last forever. Meanwhile, as we come out of the pandemic, there’s anxiety over inflation and rising interest rates, which has put downward pressure on bond prices. Long-term government bonds are down 12% on the year. U.S. treasuries, the ultimate safe haven, are down 3.3%.

In uncertain times we look to economic forecasts and predictions of what’s to come. There’s no shortage of opinions, so it’s easy to find one that fits your narrative. It’s hard not to listen when legendary investors like Jeremy Grantham call this the greatest bubble since 1929.

So, what’s an investor to do when stocks are poised to crash, bonds are in a free-fall, and cash pays next to nothing? Even gold, often pegged as an inflation hedge and portfolio diversifier, is down nearly 10% year-to-date.

Are you properly diversified?

Is your portfolio as diversified as it should be? Does it have a mix of Canadian, U.S., International, and Emerging Market stocks? A mix of short-term and long-term corporate and government bonds? 

Are you judging your portfolio as a whole or by its individual parts? It’s never easy to see a specific holding fall in value. It makes you wonder why you hold it at all. Bond holders must be feeling that way right now.

If you hold Vanguard’s Canadian Aggregate Bond Index (VAB), you’re likely not pleased to see this performance:

VAB YTD returns

When you add U.S. and Global bonds to the mix, the results are similar but slightly more favourable:

Vanguard US and Global Bonds YTD

Now let’s add Canadian, U.S., International, and Emerging Market stocks to the portfolio using Vanguard’s FTSE Canada All Cap Index (VCN), Vanguard’s U.S. Total Market Index (VUN), Vanguard’s FTSE Developed All Cap ex North America Index (VIU), and Vanguard’s FTSE Emerging Markets All Cap Index (VEE):

Vanguard Canadian, US, International ETFs

When you put all seven of these ETFs together you get Vanguard’s Balanced ETF portfolio (VBAL). Each part following its own unique path, but blended together using a rules-based approach that maintains the original target asset mix through regular rebalancing.

Here’s how that looks over a three year period (since VBAL’s inception):

VBAL since inception

This is what diversification looks like. While some individual parts lag behind, others lead the charge and drive the overall returns. Regular rebalancing helps ensure you always buy low and sell high while managing your risk and return. The result is a compound annual growth rate of 7.3% since 2018.

Perhaps the best way to visualize how diversification works is by looking at the periodic table of investment returns over the past 20 years (source: www.callan.com):

Periodic Table of investmeent returns

Last year’s winner is often next year’s loser. Every asset class has had its turn at or near the top, including large cap stocks, small cap stocks, emerging markets, real estate, bonds, and yes, even cash (once).

Do you think you can predict which assets will lead the way in 2021 and beyond? Unlikely. That’s why it’s best to diversify broadly so you can capture market returns without trying to guess where to park your money. 

What about pulling out all of your investments and moving to cash? Well, cash was the worst performing asset class in eight of the 20 years. Even in 2008-09 bonds were the better bet.

Have you rebalanced?

I’ve written before about investors getting distracted by shiny objects like cryptocurrency, technology stocks, and high-flying fund managers. Even seasoned investors were moving more of their money into U.S. stocks, technology stocks, and Bitcoin to capitalize on rising markets.

Indeed, why hold bonds at all when every other asset class has been soaring? 

The result is a portfolio and asset mix that is likely out of step with your original goals. 

Rebalancing is counterintuitive because it forces you to sell what’s going up in value and buy more of what’s going down. It’s tough to wrap your head around selling U.S. stocks to buy more Canadian stocks. Or worse, to buy more bonds.

It’s even more difficult in uncertain times. It’s easy to look back at March 2020 or March 2009 as buying opportunities of a lifetime for stocks. But in the moment it probably felt terrifying to even be holding stocks at all. 

Today, nervous investors are worried about holding bonds. What should be the stable portion of their portfolio is suddenly underwater and signs of future upside are nowhere to be found.

Damir Alnsour, a portfolio manager at Wealthsimple, has heard from many of these anxious investors in recent days. They’re asking questions like, will bonds keep going down?

“The answer is that no one really knows if it is likely to continue, but we always look at our portfolios with a long-term lens because we don’t allocate our investments based on short-term market performance. We expect that in the future there will be times where stocks are doing well, and bonds are underperforming but also the opposite. We can’t predict these times, and we don’t think anyone else can either,” said Alnsour.

He encourages his clients to take a 30,000-foot view and remember the reason their portfolio includes bonds. Bonds are a long term source of return that improve the stability of your portfolio because they often react to changes in the economic environment differently than stocks.

“During most of the major stock market downturns historically, bonds have increased in value and helped cushion losses,” said Alnsour.

Just like the three-year chart of VBAL’s returns, a well-balanced and diversified portfolio is expected to rise over time – after all, that’s why we invest in the first place. But it’s normal for the same portfolio to suffer minor short-term losses along the way that can sometimes take weeks or months to recover.

Back to Wealthsimple’s Alnsour:

“Also, keep in mind, we would rebalance the portfolio if bonds were to continue to sell-off. What this means is that should the bond allocation drop below our rebalancing threshold, we would sell some equities to add to bonds and therefore pick up more fixed income at a cheaper price and better yields (just as we would have sold bonds to add to your equity position in March of 2020!).”

Don’t Just Do Something, Stand There!

Your portfolio is like a bar of soap. The more you touch it, the smaller it gets. Yet in times of uncertainty we can’t help but feel like we need to do something to curb losses or increase gains.

The better choice, assuming you have a well-diversified and automatically rebalancing portfolio, is to log out of your investing platform, close your internet browser, and do nothing. Focus on your family, friends, hobbies – anything that will prevent you from logging back on and seeing your investments in the red.

As PWL Capital portfolio manager Benjamin Felix says, “your investment strategy shouldn’t change based on market conditions.”

That’s right. You identified your risk tolerance and time horizon, and chose your original asset mix for a reason. You understood that markets fluctuate, often negatively, for periods of time and that is out of your control. Yet when markets are going through their downswing, you feel compelled to change your approach.

Let’s go back to the term, “uncertainty”. Isn’t the future always uncertain? When are we investing in certain times? 

Pundits and market forecasters often paint a bleak future, like Grantham’s 1929-style crash or Dr. Doom Nouriel Roubini calling for hyperinflation. The truth is nobody knows how this will play out.

What if you make a tactical shift to your investment strategy and you’re wrong? There are plenty of investors who moved to cash after the global financial crisis and never found their way back into the stock market. Once you convince yourself of a particular narrative it’s nearly impossible to admit that you were wrong and change course.

Final Thoughts

It’s reality check time for investors. We’ve been in a bull market for 12 years (minus a few blips). Almost everything has worked, which can lead to overconfidence in your investing skills. Meanwhile, many investors have strayed away from their original goals to chase even higher returns from U.S. stocks, technology stocks, and the like. 

It’s time to check in on your portfolio and make sure it’s broadly diversified and risk appropriate for your age and stage of life. It’s time to rebalance, if you hold multiple funds, and get back to your original target asset mix. Finally, if you’re already invested in an appropriate asset allocation ETF or robo-advised portfolio, it’s time to do nothing. Don’t change your investing strategy based on market conditions.

Take a long-term view of your investments rather than looking at the daily changes (which can be maddening). That’s how to invest in uncertain times.

18 Comments

  1. Tim on March 5, 2021 at 1:08 pm

    Great advice during a rough week! Appreciate the reassurance that this is part of the journey and life will continue. Stick to the plan!

    • Robb Engen on March 6, 2021 at 1:30 pm

      Hi Tim, exactly – sometimes you just need to hear someone say it’ll be okay.

  2. Michael James on March 5, 2021 at 1:20 pm

    This is an important message about staying the course through difficult times. The only part that I don’t agree with is the need for diversification to include long-term bonds. Stocks and short-term bonds are unpredictable over decades, but long-term bonds are much more predictable. The long-term bonds we own today must give poor results (if held to maturity) unless we have net deflation in the coming decades or interest rates drop to minus 10% or lower. Neither seems likely.

    • Robb Engen on March 5, 2021 at 5:50 pm

      Hi Michael, I don’t necessarily disagree with you. Long-term bonds face plenty of headwinds today, but I’m not as certain what their future results will look like (and compared to what?).

      The Bank of Canada overnight rate moved up 1.25% from mid-2017 to the end of 2018. 10-year government bond yields were up about as much during that time. Yet BMO’s ZFL returned 2.56% in 2017 and 3.24% in 2018. Meanwhile, stocks performed poorly in 2018.

      It will be interesting to see how it all plays out, but we shouldn’t be surprised if our predictions turn out to be wrong.

      • Michael James on March 5, 2021 at 6:36 pm

        10+-year bond yields were flat over the period you describe which accounts for the modest ZFL returns (https://www.bankofcanada.ca/rates/interest-rates/canadian-bonds/). I’m not making predictions. I’m looking at the certainty of bond contracts and their payouts.

      • Barb on March 7, 2021 at 9:04 am

        I think I need to print out this report and read it daily. Many things are so challenging at the moment. Barb

  3. CanTex on March 5, 2021 at 2:38 pm

    To quote the late John Bogle, founder of index funds at Vanguard, “Don’t do something, just stand there”.

  4. Gary on March 6, 2021 at 7:34 am

    Excellent and a timely post Robb. I get the heebee jeebees everyday looking at the markets. I think my better half is going to take my phone and computer away from me. ((: you and Michael keep folks like me on the rails. Thank you!!!

  5. Bill Dimmick on March 6, 2021 at 8:51 am

    Great post and good advice, Robb. Your point about rebalancing is particularly valid, a principle I’ve followed for many years. Why? Because it works.

    Before retiring, I was enrolled in my organization’s defined contribution pension plan. We had to create our own portfolios by choosing from a buffet of mutual funds or GICs. I kept my funds almost entirely in index funds—back then ETFs weren’t even offered in our plan. In my 50s, I aimed for 55 per cent equities and 45 per cent fixed income. I noticed in early summer of 2008 that equities had crept up to 65 percent. So, I rebalanced.

    Many of your readers will remember the big stock crash that started that fall. I continued to monitor my portfolio and saw my bond holdings soar as the months wore on. I’d rebalance every three to six months, essentially buying equities on the cheap. That strategy worked out pretty well as recovery took hold during the ensuing years and we entered a prolonged bull market. It’s a lesson I’ve always remembered.

    I’ve been retired for several years now, and handed my RRIF and LIF over to Wealthsimple to manage in 2017. For what I consider a fairly modest fee they look after the rebalancing of my 50-50 portfolio. Yes, bonds are taking a beating right now, and my portfolio value has taken a significant hit. However, I hope to be around for another 20 years and take the long-term view. No one knows what will happen with bond or equity markets in the future.

    I’d never before read the quote from John Bogle that was posted. Unknowingly, I suppose I’ve been following his advice.

    I still have strong interest in what’s happening week to week in the markets, but never react to them by changing our plan. I think back to 2008 or even March 2020. My wife and I stuck with the plan. We have a broadly diversified portfolio of low-fee ETFs managed by a very competent low-fee advisor—Wealthsimple in our case. Our plan has served us well and we have confidence it will continue to do so. Our job now is to enjoy retirement, not sweat over it.

    • Robb Engen on March 6, 2021 at 1:42 pm

      Hi Bill, thanks for sharing your experience. You bring up two excellent points: One about staying the course and rebalancing throughout the global financial crisis, and the other about moving to a robo advisor in retirement – handing it over to a platform that can automatically invest and rebalance (and withdraw) your funds for you.

  6. John Pearson on March 6, 2021 at 9:11 am

    Wondering if the Vangaurd VBAL ETF from a tax perspective is a good investment in a non registered cash account? Any thoughtsRobb? Thanks for such a good piece of work here!

    • Robb Engen on March 6, 2021 at 1:49 pm

      Hi John, thanks for the kind words. It depends on your overall goals and retirement income needs, but in general there’s nothing wrong with holding an asset allocation ETF like VBAL in your non-registered account.

      You’ll get a quarterly distribution (annual yield of 1.86%), which is taxable. Foreign withholding taxes apply, but they are recoverable in a taxable account.

      If you’re looking for an income-oriented product for your non-registered account then VRIF is worth a look (at least that’s when it makes the most sense, in a taxable account when you’re spending the monthly distributions). And, if you’re not drawing from this portfolio and looking to defer capital gains then the Horizons swap-based one-ticket ETFs (HCON, HBAL) are worth a look.

      • Scott on May 17, 2021 at 8:19 pm

        Hi Robb:
        Any concerns with ACB calculation challenges and ETF’s in a non registered account?

        • Robb Engen on May 19, 2021 at 10:12 am

          Hi Scott, I’d suggest keeping things simple in a non-registered account and using one of the asset allocation ETFs. Your brokerage will keep track of book cost / market value but you should also track it on your own. Lots of DIY investors use adjustedcostbase.ca to keep track.

  7. JOE WILLIS on March 6, 2021 at 1:28 pm

    “Like a bar of soap. The more you touch it, the smaller it gets”. Can I steal that Robb? 🙂
    VRIF + VGRO = contentment

    • Robb Engen on March 6, 2021 at 1:51 pm

      Hi Joe, absolutely! To be fair, I’ve heard that line several times before from Preet Banerjee and Andrew Hallam so it’s not my quote.

      Yes, you’ve got a great set-up with those all-in-one products. Well done!

  8. Jim on March 7, 2021 at 10:35 am

    Thanks for your helpful posts as always! Piggybacking on another comment, I think I recall that you hold one of the Vanguard asset allocation ETFs in your corporate account too. I’m curious: what made you decide to hold the ETF vs. shares in Canadian dividend payers given the preferential tax treatment of eligible dividends?

    • Robb Engen on March 7, 2021 at 5:47 pm

      Hi Jim, thanks for the kind words. When it comes to investing I try not to let the tax tail wag the investing dog, so to speak. It’s easier for me to hold the same asset mix across all accounts. Canadian dividend payers aren’t exactly the most diverse set of companies and so I’d be limiting my investments to a small subsection of an already tiny player in the global markets.

      My corporate account will ultimately end up being the largest investment account that I manage and so I need to make sure it’s globally diversified and risk appropriate.

Leave a Comment





Join More Than 10,000 Subscribers!

Sign up now and get our free e-Book- Financial Management by the Decade - plus new financial tips and money stories delivered to your inbox every week.