Weekend Reading: Passive Investing Returns Edition

Weekend Reading: Passive Investing Returns Edition

One concept Couch Potato investors need to accept is that their portfolio will move up and down with the market(s). Since the essence of passive investing means tracking a particular index, or set of indices, an investor’s returns must closely mirror those of the index (minus a small fee).

That notion can be downright scary for nervous investors wondering when the next stock market crash will occur. Indeed, one of my biggest fears as a passive investing advocate is that there will be a massive correction at some point and all the investors I’ve helped move to a low cost portfolio of ETFs will blame me for their losses.

But I know that’s not rational and there’s a mountain of academic and empirical evidence to support a passive approach. That, and I sleep better at night knowing I give the best advice based on these three principles:

  1. Future returns are unknowable, but the best and most reliable predictor of future returns is cost. The lower the better.
  2. Active management, including the idea that market timing can deliver all of the upside while also protecting the downside, sounds better in theory than it works in practice.
  3. Asset mix matters. You need to be comfortable with your portfolio mix in good times and bad to avoid panic selling and second-guessing.

That last one is important. If you’re thinking about a passive investing strategy, or have recently started one and are nervous about an inevitable correction, it might be helpful to consider the range of possible returns you’d be willing to accept.

For example, a conservative portfolio of ETFs with 70 percent bonds and 30 percent global stocks had 20-year annualized returns of 5.25 percent. Its lowest 12-month return (March 2008 to February 2009) lost 7.93 percent.

Alternatively, an aggressive portfolio of 90 percent global stocks and 10 percent bonds surprisingly had identical 20-year annualized returns of 5.25 percent. However, the dispersion of those returns was much more volatile. The worst 12-month period saw losses of 31.09 percent.

Finally, a traditional balanced portfolio made up of 60 percent global stocks and 40 percent bonds had 20-year annualized returns of 5.38 percent (the highest of the three portfolios), and saw its worst 12-month period lose 19.62 percent.

Source: Canadian Couch Potato model portfolio returns

We’ve lived through an unprecedented bull market going on now for more than 10 years. It’s perfectly normal to feel like you want a more aggressive 100/0 or 80/20 portfolio. But do you have the temperament to hold that portfolio when faced with a 30 percent drawdown? Or will you completely abandon the strategy, thinking “it’s not working anymore”?

There are many ways to implement a passive investing portfolio. I have direct experience with three of those methods, with the one-ticket solution (VEQT) in my RRSP and TFSA, the TD e-Series funds in my kids’ RESPs, and a robo-advisor solution with my wife’s Wealthsimple RRSP.

All three portfolios have had a turbulent year, suffering big losses in May and August, but otherwise gaining steadily throughout the year and more than making up for the short correction at the end of 2018. Here are my personal rates of return so far this year:

  • RRSP – One-ticket ETF (VEQT) – up 13.13 percent
  • TFSA – One-ticket ETF (VEQT) – up 14.36 percent
  • RESP – TD e-Series funds – up 13.69 percent
  • Wife’s RRSP – Wealthsimple 80/20 portfolio – up 10.4 percent

As you can see from both the data on long-term returns, and the individual returns of various portfolios, it doesn’t necessarily matter which passive portfolio you adopt. What matters is your behaviour and how you react when markets (and your portfolio) move up and down.

A passive portfolio won’t protect you from a market crash. As investors, we must accept that occasional losses are inevitable. To cope, we need to design a portfolio with an appropriate asset mix for our risk tolerance and time horizon – and have the patience to stay the course.

This Week’s Recap:

This week I wrote about five retirement planning options to help you reach your retirement goals.

Thanks to Jonathan Chevreau for sharing my thoughts in his latest piece for the Financial Post: How investors can navigate the new world of ETF overload.

And Justin Bender from PWL Capital launched his long-awaited podcast this week and included a question from me about the benefits of U.S. dollar ETFs.

Weekend Reading:

An excellent and informative piece from the How To Save Money blog on the 7 best travel insurance credit cards for people over 65.

Which Canadian rewards program is worth the most? Check out this comprehensive guide from the Credit Card Genius team.

Here’s Rob Carrick on how seniors should prepare for the day when they can no longer look after their retirement investments.

Read this complete guide to your RRSP from the Handful of Thoughts blog.

Nobel Laureate Daniel Kahneman explains why trying to convince other people to change their mind is a waste of time. It turns out, the key isn’t to apply more pressure but rather to understand:

Head over to the Farnam Street blog to listen to the full episode.

The Canadian financial advice industry needs higher standards and higher education requirements. It begs the question: Is it unethical to be incompetent?

The evidence is clear that ETFs give the best returns for investors. Here are seven strategies for maximizing returns from ETFs.

A Wealth of Common Sense blogger Ben Carlson gives a eulogy for the 60/40 balanced portfolio.

Nobody wants to lose money, so it is common to wonder what can be done to avoid the potentially negative stock returns that often come with a recession. Ben Felix explains:

Dale Roberts asks what would it take to reach F.I.R.E., and really retire early?

Finally, My Own Advisor Mark Seed answers an age old question of whether to pay down your mortgage or invest.

Have a great weekend, everyone!

Print Friendly, PDF & Email


  1. Maria @ Handful of Thoughts on October 19, 2019 at 3:33 pm

    Thanks for the mention.

    Although I’m pursuing some form of financial independence, my investments are all in a set it and forget it type of mode. Because I’m not planning on drawing down from them right away (or anytime soon) I’m not overly concerned with how they fluctuate.

    Maybe as I get closer to wanting to draw down from them I may watch them more closely and adjust my asset allocation but for now they are out of sight, out of mind for most of the time.

  2. Gene on October 20, 2019 at 6:07 am

    Thanks for this. Do you have dividends in your overall YTD return calculations?

    • Robb Engen on October 20, 2019 at 5:21 pm

      Hi Gene, thanks – yes the returns include dividends.

      • Gene on October 20, 2019 at 6:09 pm

        Cool! good performance. Overall this has been a good year.

  3. Christian on October 20, 2019 at 7:19 am

    Those are some great returns on your VEQT but it doesnt factor in the big drop at the end of 2018. I jumped on the passive bandwagon at the end of April with my largest investment in VGRO. My VGRO returns since then are at -0.18%. I’m still happy with the passive approach but getting over the negative return hump would be nice. Cant time the market but I have a habit of jumping in at the wrong times 😉

    • Robb Engen on October 20, 2019 at 5:36 pm

      Hi Christian, you’re right it doesn’t factor in the 4th quarter correction in 2018. You’re also right that you can’t time the market. The key is just getting started. This mediocre start to your passive investing strategy will look like a tiny blip on the radar in 10 years.

      My TD Direct Investing history goes back to Dec 2010 and since then my RRSP has returned 121.85% – or 9.48% annually. In that time there have been lots of ups and downs (mostly ups) but I’ve stayed invested and reaped the rewards.

  4. Gus on October 20, 2019 at 10:40 pm

    Hello Rob !
    I have a question for you please regarding emerging market.
    I’ve been a couch potato investor for about two years now and i followed Justin bender’s portfolio recommendation of Vab Vcn Xef Xec and Vun with a 60/40 stock/bonds allocation but after a couple of few months i sold Xec and added the money to Xef and here i admit i was reading a lot of online articles on how volatile and unstable in Emg market is , so since then I’m only invested in north america and developed European and Asia , so i like to hear your thoughts on Emerging market am i missing a lot ?

    • Robb Engen on October 28, 2019 at 11:04 am

      Hi Gus, I try not to trend follow when it comes to which markets are predicted to be up or down. I just buy everything (cheaply) and hold for the long term. I can’t think of a good argument not to be in emerging markets (along with NA, Europe, and every other market in the world).

  5. Eli Boles on October 28, 2019 at 7:44 am

    Hi Robb,

    I have a question about your wife RRSP – is it 80% bonds and 20% stocks or opposite?

    • Robb Engen on October 28, 2019 at 11:05 am

      Hi Eli, sorry for the confusion. Her portfolio is 80% stocks and 20% bonds.

Leave a Comment

Join More Than 10,000 Subscribers!

Sign up now and get our free e-Book- Financial Management by the Decade - plus new financial tips and money stories delivered to your inbox every week.